Lsi raid driver links
![lsi raid driver links lsi raid driver links](https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/support/docs/servers-unified-computing/unified-computing-system/200986-TechNote-on-High-Disk-Performance-Utiliz-00.gif)
![lsi raid driver links lsi raid driver links](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71VTqIyPSHL._AC_SX466_.jpg)
That has been their attitude while the FreeBSD developers have been more focused on providing a stable system. If their changes break your system well then too bad, go fix it. It’s a general purpose hobby kernel to them. Contrary to popular belief Linus & co are not trying to design a kernel for server use. I don’t like how Linus & co can send kernel changes downstream that can break working hardware. Many argue this is a good thing, but I counter that in the end it hurts the end user.
#Lsi raid driver links plus#
Linux is the kernel and FreeBSD is the kernel plus base userland and a much more unified and integrated “system”, plus it hasn’t splintered into a bajillion little pieces like the Linux distros have. However, it’s freedom of choice and I normally choose FreeBSD. I think Linux would have been better served maintaining a concentric core and base system. It was great when it was a relatively unknown OS and no one really cared, but now you’ve got companies cherry picking distros to “support” and if it isn’t one you like or run then you’re screwed. Linux didn’t start getting heavy commercial support and recognition until 2004/5 or so and now it’s got a decent marketing wave behind where even many PHBs are okay with running Linux, but turn all white and pasty when you suggest something like FreeBSD. If BSD hadn’t had the legal issues it did in the early 90s it had a really good shot at becoming the dominant “free” UNIX. Personally, I think the parent is correct. Which came first? The chicken or the egg? Same scenario here.
#Lsi raid driver links windows#
I honestly feel that if Solaris or FreeBSD had a similar HW support than Linux, either of them would have made a far better x86 unix for large vendors to standardize around (at least as a clear alternative to windows in the x86 market).
#Lsi raid driver links software#
The instability of linux’s programming interfaces among so many variables (not just major kernel revision) makes it such a PITA to deploy software on it.Īt one design team, we had 3 different commercial tools, which supported 3 different distro/revision combinations. Heck if they had the possibility of supporting OpenCL/CUDA, FreeBSD would be pretty close to my ideal development platform. I am actually very excited for the technologies which the FreeBSD team are incorporating: Jails, the trace subsystem from solaris, ZFS. But come on… when I had to do a FreeBSD installation involving ZFS, the process was borderline maddening. I have never liked their installer though, last time I installed FreeBSD I used the PC-BSD installer.Īrcane exoteric installations were cool a decade and a half ago.